Basic Methodology of Quantum Field Science
Games and Theory
Quantum Field science is a terminology given to a new type of
physical science that completely replaces the current atomic model
allowing the possibility of explaining all actions and functions
including anomalies and chaotic functionality.
theories give the user the ability to mathematically explain the
functionality of certain aspects of the known universe, but fail to
anticipate and/or explain seemingly random chaotic functions that
occur. The reason for this is that the base construct that is
currently seen as the foundation of existence is in fact incorrect, in
the sense that function, energy and matter are seen as separate
entities that co-exist rather than being seen as the same “material”
viewed from differing perspectives.
existence of atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons and all other
hypothetical particles within the physical realm has never been proven
to exist, but still to this day are used as the solid foundation for
all matter and functions throughout the known universe. Aspects such
as environment are limited to the immediate vicinity while
contraindications that occur throughout the intended function are
viewed as “side effects” and/or “random variations” and hence ignored
or given the application of an etheric formula or fabricated function
in order to compensate for the irregularity in the integrity of the
progression of the event.
model/concept begins at the very core of simplicity itself, and is an
explanation to not only physical matter, but to the functions,
reactions, interactions and complex procedures that occur throughout
nature that range from the simplest physical reaction through to the
complexity of the human biomass. Many of these events throughout our
universe are not explainable, with the use of current concepts, by any
one doctrine or philosophy. Several are usually needed to generate a
hypothesis of the action based purely on postulated supposition and
conjecture of the occurrences surrounding an event from a biased
objective view. This statement is not intended to ridicule the
sciences, but allow them to see that the “third person” perspective
based system of analysis is no longer a valid method of discerning a
viable solution nor is it an efficient use of time and resources when
attempting to predetermine an accurate outcome to an event or
the current theories surrounding the physical universe contain
exceptions to the rule and have anomalies surrounding them that
contravene their existence. It is mainly due to the complexity and
multitude of these various theorems that leads to their eventual
extinction, but in order to maintain their integrity, each in turn
will be used to support the other in such a fashion as to generate a
circular argument or function that relies upon the existence of proof
of another presumption. Unfortunately, this only leads to the creation
of a hypothetical universe, which is only one percent effective and
useful in the real universe.
Particles and Waves
knowledge of current theories and methodology is limited to basics of
the philosophy for that is all that should be required from a concept
to establish an individual knowledge base from the first person.
physics denotes that the universe is made up of particles ranging from
atoms and molecules through to quarks and neutrinos. These particles
have physical size and weight, as does a grain of sand on the beach,
implying that the beach is a solid singular object and a grain of sand
is a representation of one of an almost infinite number of molecules
that makes up the entire object. Each molecule contains the parts,
components and three-dimensional pattern that make up the entire
object as a singular mass.
can give us the make-up of the object, but cannot give us the spatial
geometry. Physics can give us reactance to the object from exterior
sources, which tells us how the object interacts with our physical
universe, but still cannot give us certain answers.
can give us the physical shape and dimensions but in the end none of
the current doctrines can give us the one single thing that is
required to truly understand, which is what the object actually is.
the other hand, can give us the resultant effect of the object's
interaction with its surrounding environment, which is then discerned
as the object's signature. If an object is interacted with by another
object or effect, it will exhibit and emit a waveform effect that is
based on the object's source signature (that is -- the innate
emanation of the compounded vibrations emitting from the individual
components that make up the object) or global MRF (Magnetic Resonance
Frequency) and the waveform pattern used to create the desired
response from the object.
To coin an
analogy, if you throw a pebble into a pond, the resultant waves
display the effect of the object on its surroundings.
of these two scientific concepts would have to be “waves” since the
resultant fluctuation of effect generated by the object is seen as a
“magnetic” effect in nature and not considered as solid mass or matter
in respect to what is called solid.
step that the wave theory has not taken is to remove the particle
theory from the equation and base the initial calculations on an
existent compound mass as a “wave” based function/event instead of a
particle discerned format that is “seen” to generate waveform
emissions. The angle of thought required to approach this subject is
to see the emitter itself as a function/event that evolves with and
conforms to the restrictions and capabilities of its environment and
surroundings. The emitter itself is an emission as such generated by
the action of both its own construct and that which developed it as an
outcome event. (ps…this is not a “chicken and the egg” theory since
the former and later are both a construct of corporeal fields).
that I am attempting to make here is not to ridicule the doctrines,
but to show that the perspective view of a
substance/object/function/event can only show an outcome in reference
to the voyeur. The substance/object/function/event cannot be set a
series of guidelines and parameters based on what the voyeur requires.
The substance/object/function/event has its own parameters in
reference to itself and its surroundings based on what it is, where,
when, how and why and also in which sequence of already existent
events it is currently involved in.
A “field” is currently described as an emanation of an object of
substance that is the resultant effect of the material of the
substance or interaction with another object of same, similar, or
a field is that which surrounds.
not exactly correct.
in the Q Mechanics terminology is that which “is”. The substance /
object as it is without any exterior interaction from other sources.
That which makes up the material or the object contains a pattern or
signature that designates what it is, where it is, when, how and why.
A field or
signature of an object is a culmination of many constituents and/or
actions/functions that make it up. These constituents are not physical
matter as we know it, but in fact are the actions/functions that
interact with each other to develop an evolvement of what is
considered as physical matter or particle form. The evolvement is
established by the interaction of two or more actions in an immediate
environmental medium. In any functional equation we have a minimum of
3 constituents to produce an action.
Three – Four Base Table
The 3-4 base table is a simplistic method of how to explain the
action, function and interaction of the base “elemental” signatures
that make up a complex signature or Global Resonance Signature. This
GRS is the representative pattern format of an actual physical piece
of solid matter, which means that it is actually the physical piece of
solid matter and not just a function generated by its existence within
to explain this core/base fundamental action (3-4 base table), The
labels of “Alpha”, “Beta” and “Gamma” will be given to the three core
functions. “Alpha” will represent the first action/function, “Beta”
will represent the second and “Gamma” will be the medium/environment.
Mathematical Extrapolation of the Function of a “Delta” Point or
After the “Delta” evolves, it becomes the “Alpha” or “Beta”
of the next evolutionary function in the chain of events that occur to
formulate the pattern construct of an action / function / object /
The Delta becomes the next Alpha or Beta
This action/function of the 3-4 is not bound to the linear progression
of time even though time plays an important part in the evolvement of
the global event. The timing of the interactions is based upon the
formulated strategy of the environment verses the constituency of the
interactions in relation to the events that within and surrounding the
currently observed event.
event does not necessarily have to become a base function of the next
event. This is what creates an event sequence in that the Delta events
that do not evolve to the next function become signature markers for
the progression of the creation of a “Delta Bar” or singular
individual marker aspect of the GRS.
As can be
seen above, the 3 different event sequences look different, but in
fact they are the same event sequence seen from 3 differing
sequence or Delta sequence is in fact far more detailed and complex
than is shown above, but for explanation purposes, the diagrams will
be kept simple so as to be understood.
sequence that is shown on the left is a representation of a more
complex and detailed function / event.
picture on the right represents a combination of these events or Delta
sequences that is referred to as a MATRIX. This combination depicts a
complete Delta function, which is the Culmination of all of the
individual events giving rise to Stage 1 of a GRS.
below is a simplified version of the MATRIX shown as such so as to
allow for the representation of the Delta sequences to be displayed as
differing from each other.
Event Sequence is different in that the size/intensity, position,
rotation, vector angle and direction of focus vary from Delta Point to
Delta Point thus creating a seemingly random and chaotic construct.
The randomness of the sequence is in fact ordered and follows a
specific design depending upon the material or action / function of
the final GRS.
stage in the construction is to interact several of these matrices
together so as to generate a larger and more complex signature base.
Stage 2 (as seen below) is the visual representation of the next level
the apparent randomness of the construct can be seen in the pictures
above and below, but in fact there is a specific pattern evolving that
can be extrapolated from the matrix through to the solid mass. This
pattern is the emergence of what is referenced as a “signature” of the
substance/object/function/event. The individual matrices interact with
each other, not as separate entities as is depicted above, but as an
individual mass that is in a virtual liquid state of both motion and
function. Interactions and evolving functions are not bound to each
point but are still bound by the constraints of the pre-existent
evolvement of the delta construct as such.
“zoom out”, it can be seen that the matrix is interacting with itself
and integrating to form a pattern construct. This combination of
matrices can be now identified as a complex pattern that will evolve
into a GRS construct.
representation of the sphere below is a pictorial representation of a
GRS template of an object / function. All three images below represent
differing visual perspectives of the emission pattern generated by the
GRS. This is what a true “frequency” of a substance or action /
function is. The first is a wire frame that allows you to still see
the functions and interactions that form the GRS. The second shows the
silhouette of the GRS while still allowing the functions to be seen,
while the third shows the exterior true representation of a frequency
in its entirety. These three representations are still the same
object/signature but have been shown as such to give you a perspective
view of the signature from differing angles of thought.
Below is a
pattern as seen on a 2D imaging system such as a CRO (Cathode Ray
Oscilloscope). This signature/signal of an
object/substance/action/function is an interpolation by a
two-dimensional measuring system attempting to measure a three
to do this, the device requires a cross-sectional aspect of the GRS in
order to take the measurements of the function. This cross-section is
in a 2D aspect and unfortunately does not give a true representation
of the pattern construct of the material/function.
(Addendum Point 1) States of Matter
If the reference of the GRS is taken into consideration, then
the can only be 1 state of matter. Since every event is constantly in
motion and evolving within its own environmental constraints, and
those environments are a function of the outcome of the previous
evolvement, then this can be considered as “fluid” motion as there are
no pauses, stops nor stationary events occurring within the construct.
commonly referred to “3 states of matter” are simply visual aspects of
a fluid function based on observer’s own function being the reference
point for the establishment of the parameters on which the state is
being judged. Solid is still fluid, as is gaseous. These observations
are based on the corporeal existence and function of the observer and
not on the object/function/event itself.
qualifying example of this is water. When in its natural environmental
state based on its location and functionality, it is liquid. When
heated it vaporizes to steam and when frozen, it solidifies to ice. As
its environment is altered, so is its representative format in
reference to the observer, but it always remains water.
From a core GRS, a complex event/function can be formulated by
interacting 2 or more GRS constructs together in an environmental
situation. The equating procedure is identical per evolvement step
irrespective of the size, shape or consistency of the event. This
action holds true throughout all functions. An example would be in
order to joint 2 pieces of steel together, the environment must
include a heat component sufficient enough to destabilize the
functionality of the GRS construct of both materials to a synchronous
point where the 2 combine as a fluid.
Gamma (Environment) is a common or synchronous factor to the Alpha and
Beta alike, then there will be an interaction between the two
actions/materials based on the event process of the Gamma function.
As can be
seen above, the two elements, once interacted with by an environmental
event that was synchronous to particular aspects of the differing GRS
patterns, developed a combined function based of the Alpha, Beta and
Gamma elements in the equation. Since evolvement is continually
unidirectional, the function of “undoing” the event is not to do
exactly the “opposite” function in order to separate the two aspects
from each other, but rather to discern the commonality points of the
event sequence that developed the event and apply a synchronous
catalyst and/or function/event sequence that will evolve the
separation of the two substances.